Monetary Unions of Ancient Greece
In the ancient Greek world groups of smaller cities that had
common trading interests and were too small to support individual mints formed
monetary unions. These unions minted coins that were legal tender in all the
member cities, which also split the profits from the coinage. These union coins
might be struck in one federal mint, or several member cities might operate
mints that shared in minting the union coinage. Often one side of these union
coins bore a common symbol of the monetary union and the reverse side bore a
symbol of the city where the coin was issued. Coins issued at different mints under
the authority of a monetary union possessed a uniform weight and purity. These
coins served as an international currency in their trading area, restricting the
need for moneychangers, and avoiding the business hazards of fluctuations in
foreign currency markets.
A monetary convention between Phocea and Mitylene, adopted around 400 b.c., represents one of the few agreements for a monetary
union whose details survived for our inspection. The prerogative for striking
coins alternated between each city on an annual basis. Each year one city closed
its mint while the mint in the other city met the need for coins that year.
These cities agreed to issue electrum coins identical in weight and purity, but
without a uniform emblem, and the coins from either mint were legal tender in
both cities.
At the end of the fifth century a group of towns and tribes on the western
coast of Greece formed a monetary union, but knowledge of this union is limited
to what can be gathered from the coins. Its coins were based on the silver
stater of Corinth, a popular coin in the trading area around Italy and
Sicily, and its coins bore identical images; a head of Athena on the obverse
side, and Pegasus on the reverse side. This union thrived until the second
century b.c. when the Roman invasion put an end to
it.
The cities of Boeotia, north of Attica, joined into a monetary union that
lasted from early times until the coming of Rome. The union began coining silver
and later added a uniform bronze coinage. Although struck at different mints,
the coins were uniform in weight and purity, and bore on the obverse side a
badge that represented the union and on the reverse side a symbol of the city of
origin.
One of the largest of the monetary unions federated as many as 43 cities at
one time, including Corinth, Argos, and Lacedaemon. Its silver coins dominated
trade within the Peloponnese from 280 b.c. to 146 b.c. when the area became a Roman province.
These unions were sometimes the by-products of military alliances.
Mobilization of an army always created a demand for coinage, and armies were
instrumental in spreading coinage. Also, cities that patronized the same
religious temples, or sacred games and festivals, were more likely to issue a
federated currency that supported shared activities.
The strengths of a monetary union remain very real in areas such as Europe,
where small but sophisticated economies function in close geographical
proximity. In 1998 the European Monetary Union planned the final step toward
monetary unification with the introduction of a single European currency.
No comments:
Post a Comment