Forced Savings
Forced savings refers to the use of money creation and
inflation to divert resources into the production and acquisition of capital
goods. A government that prints up money, as opposed to levying taxes or selling
bonds, to pay for the construction of a hydroelectric generation facility is
pursuing a policy of forced savings. Less-developed countries, particularly in
Latin America, turned to forced savings policies in the post–World War II era as
a means of financing economic development. At least some of the inflation in
Latin America has its roots in economic development strategies based on forced
savings.
The mechanics of forced savings operates through the medium of inflation. The
government prints up money to purchase capital goods, attracting resources into
the production of capital goods at the expense of consumer goods. Consumer goods
production falls relative to demand, and consumer goods prices increase,
reducing the amount of consumer goods that households can afford. This forced
reduction in consumer goods acquisition translates as forced savings. Consumers
still spend the same amount of money, it just does not stretch as far as it did
before inflation. Thus the consumers do not come out with any more savings, but
society does, because society is extracting resources for the production of
capital goods. The forced reduction in consumer goods production is the key to
forced savings.
Savings always involve a reduction in current acquisition of consumer goods.
Ordinarily, households elect to divert a share of income away from consumption expenditures, and set that share of income aside as
savings. Financial institutions and stock and bond markets channel these savings
into businesses that need financing to purchase capital goods. Savings are
always at the expense of consumption expenditures, but normally savings are a
voluntary choice of households. Societies must save, that is, depress current
consumption, in order to make resources available for the production of capital
goods.
Economists and policy makers have advanced several arguments in favor of
forced savings as an attractive vehicle for financing economic development.
First, vast portions of the populations of less-developed countries live at the
margin of subsistence, too poor to voluntarily engage in much saving. Second,
many less-developed countries do not have the financial institutions necessary
to mobilize the small savings of individual households. Third, wars have shown
that governments can print up money to finance major public undertakings without
destroying economic systems. The same effort that goes into financing a war can
theoretically be tapped to finance industrialization.
Notwithstanding arguments favoring forced savings, the anti-inflation bias in
current economic thinking emphasizes the downside of any policy that can only be
activated with inflation. There has been no evidence of a correlation between
inflation and growth, and many countries, such as Britain and the United States,
experienced rapid economic development in the nineteenth century without
inflation. Also inflation disrupts society and the burden of inflation is not
evenly shared. Unionized workers can often strike and gain wage increases that
compensate for inflation and some businesses may receive government aid that
compensates for inflation. Other groups in society, those on fixed incomes or
living on past savings, are likely to bear the bulk of the inflation burden.
Inflation encourages households to invest voluntary savings in hedges against
inflation such as land, buildings, jewelry, gold, silver, or stocks of grocery
and household necessities. Investment in hedges against inflation diverts
voluntary savings away from the purchase of capital goods such as factories,
machinery, etc. After inflation has become expected, creditors extort high
interest rates as inflation protection, further discouraging risk-bearing
entrepreneurs from accessing sources of borrowed funds.
In countries that insist upon printing up money to finance government
expenditures, forced savings strategies may make more sense than the acquisition
of military goods, or the construction of lavish government buildings and
monuments. Nevertheless, forced savings, because of its inflationary effects,
entails major complications for the efficient operation of the economy, and
seems to hold little charm for contemporary policy makers.
No comments:
Post a Comment