Case of Mixt Monies
At the turn of the seventeenth century the Case of Mixt
Monies (1601), one of the most famous legal-tender cases in English history,
upheld the principle in English-speaking countries that sovereign governments
command the prerogative to confer legal-tender status on a monetary unit.
On 23 April 1601 Elizabeth Brett purchased 200 pounds of wares from a London
merchant. Brett paid 100 pounds up front and committed herself to pay in
September another 100 pounds sterling in current and lawful money of England.
The September payment was also to be paid in Dublin, Ireland. An important
complication occurred on 24 May when Queen Elizabeth sent to Ireland certain
“mixt monies” from the Tower Mint, with official stamps and inscriptions, and
proclaimed that the mixed money would be the lawful and current money of
Ireland, at rate of a shilling for a shilling, and a sixpence for a sixpence,
and that none should refuse it. The queen also proclaimed that after 10 July
other money in Ireland would be valued only as bullion, and not as current
money. The mixed money was of a baser alloy than England’s coinage and was not
current and lawful money in England. On the day of payment, Brett tendered
payment in 100 pounds of the mixed money, which, according to proclamation of
the English crown, was current and lawful money in Ireland.
The London merchant protested, not wanting to accept the baser currency when
the original contract specified sterling, and brought the dispute to court. The
issue at hand was whether a time contract among parties required payment in the
money that was current and lawful at the time the parties entered into the
contract, or the money that was current at the time in the future when the
contract specified that payment be made. The court found in favor of Brett,
firmly sanctioning the right of the sovereign power to endow a monetary unit with legal-tender status.
The Constitution of the United States did not expressly confer upon Congress
the power to endow a monetary unit with legal tender status, and forbade the
states from declaring any money as legal tender other than gold and silver
coins. In 1883 the Supreme Court upheld the right of the Congress to make a
paper money issue legal tender, citing, among other things, that historically
such a right belonged with the prerogatives of sovereignty.
No comments:
Post a Comment